{"id":6311,"date":"2026-02-09T06:39:40","date_gmt":"2026-02-09T06:39:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/?p=6311"},"modified":"2026-02-11T08:58:16","modified_gmt":"2026-02-11T08:58:16","slug":"accuracy-in-construction-estimation-bim-quantity-take-offs-vs-traditional-boqs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/accuracy-in-construction-estimation-bim-quantity-take-offs-vs-traditional-boqs\/","title":{"rendered":"Accuracy in Construction Estimation: BIM Quantity Take-offs vs Traditional BOQs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #000000;\"><b>Introduction<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Accurate quantity take-offs are fundamental to project costing, budgeting, procurement planning and risk management in construction. Traditionally, estimators and quantity surveyors have relied more on the manual methods and 2D drawings to compile Bills of Quantities (BOQs). However, with the rapid adoption of digital tools and modeling workflows, <\/span><b>BIM-based quantity take-offs<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> are emerging as the more accurate and efficient alternative.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">Understanding how these two approaches compare\u2014with real data\u2014helps the AEC teams to reduce errors, optimize costs and improves predictability.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #000000;\"><b>What Are Manual BOQs and BIM-Based Quantity Take-offs?<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #000000;\"><b>Manual BOQs<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A <\/span><b>Bill of Quantities (BOQ)<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> prepared manually involves measuring the quantities from 2D drawings (paper or CAD), then transcribing those measurements into standardized BOQ formats. This process is laborious, time-intensive and relies heavily on human interpretation and accuracy.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #000000;\"><b>BIM-Based Quantity Take-offs<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">In contrast, BIM integrates quantity extraction directly from a digital, object-oriented model that contains geometric and attribute data. This allows the quantities to be automatically computed, updated with the design changes and shared across the stakeholders.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As a <\/span><b>BIM Services Provider<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, leveraging this model intelligence allows the firms to deliver accurate and dynamic quantity data linked with the design, scheduling, cost and delivery systems\u2014from <\/span><b>4D to 7D BIM Services<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #000000;\"><b>Key Accuracy Differences: Data &amp; Evidence<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #000000;\"><b> Human Error vs Automated Precision<\/b><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Manual take-offs are subject to human errors such as misreading dimensions, duplicated entries and oversight\u2014issues that often go undetected until late in the project. Traditional methods have <\/span><b>error rates ranging from 5% to 15%<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> or more simply due to the manual data entry and multiple re-measures.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In contrast, BIM-based take-offs extract quantities directly from the intelligent 3D elements where the dimensions and materials are parametrically defined. This dramatically minimizes the ambiguity and error propagation. Studies and industry tools reports <\/span><b>up to 95%+ accuracy<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in model-driven quantity extraction with robust data.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #000000;\"><b> Time Savings and Iteration<\/b><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Automated quantity take-off tools powered by BIM can reduce the time spent on take-offs by up to <\/span><b>80% compared to the traditional manual calculation workflows<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">Because BIM quantities update in real time with the design revisions, there\u2019s no need to manually re-measure drawings whenever changes occur\u2014a common requirement in manual BOQs that both increases time and compounds risk.<\/span><\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #000000;\"><b> Integrated Data and Real-Time Updates<\/b><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">In manual BOQs, a change in the design means updated drawings must be re-distributed and re-measured, often triggering the version control issues and inconsistencies.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">BIM Quantity Take-offs, however, auto-reflects the design changes in schedules and reports across disciplines instantly thus ensuring that the quantities used for budgeting and forecasting are always current.<\/span><\/p>\n<ol start=\"4\">\n<li><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #000000;\"><b> Complexity and Project Scale<\/b><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">For complex elements such as layered walls, embedded MEP components or precast assemblies, manual methods often under-represent the material volumes or overlook assembly intricacies.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">BIM models host the detailed attribute data for each component\u2014dimensions, materials, cost codes, scheduling data (4D), cost data (5D) and sustainability metrics (6D\/7D). This breadth improves the <\/span><b>completeness and accuracy<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> of the quantity output.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #000000;\"><b>Quantified Impacts on Accuracy<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Here are some <\/span><b>quantitative comparisons<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> backed by studies and industry sources:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b>Metric<\/b><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b>Manual BOQ<\/b><\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b>BIM-Based Quantity Take-off<\/b><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">Typical Measurement Errors<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">5%\u201315% or more<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">&lt;5% or negligible with quality data<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">Time Required<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">Weeks for complex projects<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">Days or hours depending on model maturity<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">Update Responsiveness<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">Manual revisions needed<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">Automatic updates with model changes<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">Cost Forecast Reliability<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">Dependent on estimator skill<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">High, with data-linked quantities and cost integration<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">Collaboration Quality<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">Distributed &amp; siloed<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">Centralized, cross-discipline access<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #000000;\"><b>Challenges and Best Practices<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">While BIM-based take-offs offers major accuracy advantages, they are not a plug-and-play solution without process discipline:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><b>Model Quality Matters:<\/b><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Accurate take-offs depends on high-quality, well-modeled design content. Incomplete models leads to the incorrect quantities.<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><b>Standards and Protocols:<\/b><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Establish BIM Execution Plans, naming conventions and LOD standards to ensure the consistent and reliable data.<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><b>Training and Expertise:<\/b><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Investment in upskilling QS teams on BIM tools and workflows enhances precision and adoption.<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #000000;\"><b>Conclusion<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The shift from the manual BOQs to BIM-based Quantity Take-offs represents a <\/span><b>paradigm change in accuracy, efficiency and project assurance<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. By automating the measurements and aligning the quantity data directly with the digital model, teams reduce errors, gains real-time insights and strengthens the cost predictability.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For construction firms seeking a competitive edge, partnering with a <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/bim-modelling-services.php\"><b>BIM Services Provider<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> that delivers solutions across multiple dimensions\u2014from <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/4d-to-7d-bim-services.php\"><b>4D to 7D BIM Services<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2014not only enhances the accuracy but also supports the smarter planning, execution and delivery throughout the building lifecycle.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400; color: #000000;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction Accurate quantity take-offs are fundamental to project costing, budgeting, procurement planning and risk management in construction. Traditionally, estimators and quantity surveyors have relied more on the manual methods and 2D drawings to compile Bills of Quantities (BOQs). However, with the rapid adoption of digital tools and modeling workflows, BIM-based quantity take-offs are emerging as &hellip;<\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more\"> <a class=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/accuracy-in-construction-estimation-bim-quantity-take-offs-vs-traditional-boqs\/\"> <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Accuracy in Construction Estimation: BIM Quantity Take-offs vs Traditional BOQs<\/span> Read More &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":6312,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[341,428,117,488],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>BIM Quantity Take-offs vs BOQs in Construction Estimation<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Compare BIM quantity take-offs and traditional BOQs to see how BIM improves accuracy, reduces errors, and enhances cost estimation efficiency.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/accuracy-in-construction-estimation-bim-quantity-take-offs-vs-traditional-boqs\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"BIM Quantity Take-offs vs BOQs in Construction Estimation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Compare BIM quantity take-offs and traditional BOQs to see how BIM improves accuracy, reduces errors, and enhances cost estimation efficiency.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/accuracy-in-construction-estimation-bim-quantity-take-offs-vs-traditional-boqs\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"QeCAD\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-09T06:39:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-11T08:58:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Accuracy-in-Construction-Estimation-BIM-Quantity-Take-offs-vs-Traditional-BOQs.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"3000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dolly Bulchandani\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dolly Bulchandani\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/accuracy-in-construction-estimation-bim-quantity-take-offs-vs-traditional-boqs\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/accuracy-in-construction-estimation-bim-quantity-take-offs-vs-traditional-boqs\/\",\"name\":\"BIM Quantity Take-offs vs BOQs in Construction Estimation\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-09T06:39:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-11T08:58:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/#\/schema\/person\/8c56b3524c1adbaee80844e72cae12b1\"},\"description\":\"Compare BIM quantity take-offs and traditional BOQs to see how BIM improves accuracy, reduces errors, and enhances cost estimation efficiency.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/accuracy-in-construction-estimation-bim-quantity-take-offs-vs-traditional-boqs\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/\",\"name\":\"QeCAD\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/#\/schema\/person\/8c56b3524c1adbaee80844e72cae12b1\",\"name\":\"Dolly Bulchandani\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e8c5399c9fc7248fb0235ede2c75129f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e8c5399c9fc7248fb0235ede2c75129f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Dolly Bulchandani\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/author\/dollybulchandani\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"BIM Quantity Take-offs vs BOQs in Construction Estimation","description":"Compare BIM quantity take-offs and traditional BOQs to see how BIM improves accuracy, reduces errors, and enhances cost estimation efficiency.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/accuracy-in-construction-estimation-bim-quantity-take-offs-vs-traditional-boqs\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"BIM Quantity Take-offs vs BOQs in Construction Estimation","og_description":"Compare BIM quantity take-offs and traditional BOQs to see how BIM improves accuracy, reduces errors, and enhances cost estimation efficiency.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/accuracy-in-construction-estimation-bim-quantity-take-offs-vs-traditional-boqs\/","og_site_name":"QeCAD","article_published_time":"2026-02-09T06:39:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-11T08:58:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":3000,"height":1800,"url":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Accuracy-in-Construction-Estimation-BIM-Quantity-Take-offs-vs-Traditional-BOQs.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Dolly Bulchandani","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dolly Bulchandani","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/accuracy-in-construction-estimation-bim-quantity-take-offs-vs-traditional-boqs\/","url":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/accuracy-in-construction-estimation-bim-quantity-take-offs-vs-traditional-boqs\/","name":"BIM Quantity Take-offs vs BOQs in Construction Estimation","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-02-09T06:39:40+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-11T08:58:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/#\/schema\/person\/8c56b3524c1adbaee80844e72cae12b1"},"description":"Compare BIM quantity take-offs and traditional BOQs to see how BIM improves accuracy, reduces errors, and enhances cost estimation efficiency.","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/accuracy-in-construction-estimation-bim-quantity-take-offs-vs-traditional-boqs\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/","name":"QeCAD","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/#\/schema\/person\/8c56b3524c1adbaee80844e72cae12b1","name":"Dolly Bulchandani","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e8c5399c9fc7248fb0235ede2c75129f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e8c5399c9fc7248fb0235ede2c75129f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Dolly Bulchandani"},"url":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/author\/dollybulchandani\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6311"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6311"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6311\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6388,"href":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6311\/revisions\/6388"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6312"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6311"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6311"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qecad.com\/cadblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6311"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}